Видео

We shall see. Hashem is in control.🙃

When was the last time 97% of "scientists" agreed on something which turned out to be wrong? I dont know? Maybe the mask lie? Lying about the lethality of covid? lying about overloaded Hospitals? Lying about the vaccines? Saying they are safe and effective? Denying the Lab Leak?

11:35 --" ...but heats up the lower atmosphere where greenhouse gases accumulate.." >>> CO2 , Methan, Ammonium and watervapor are quite evenly distributed! But do you know whats more abundant in the lower regions? Argon! Plus: The denser, the higher the temperature. In fact all weather stations haven been replaced into the valley, often next to a street where they are easier accessable, but also show 0.5-1.5° higher temperatures. Plus: the sun has shun with greater intensity. But that does not heat up the atsmosphere! Its the visible light, especially green light which incite water to change into vapor. Wate-vapor is the greenhouse gas with the greatest impact. Clouds reflect IR rays back down to Earth, slowing down cooling processes, and in addition: Every time water vapor turns back to rain, it emitts the stored solar energy into the air, heating up the air. Thats not just stored IRlight, thats a lot of visible light converted into IRwaves. Therefore the suns activity has a huge impact

CO2 absorbs IR-rays, turns it into kinetic energy, passing on that energy to the air, most of if gets re-emitted again, but now only in the typical spectrum of CO2. One can easily detect that with a spectrometer. The emission requires a greater intake of energy to create the typical wave length of CO2. So, CO2 takes up a lot of energy in order to emitt its own IR. ONLY HALF Of that Energy goes back to Earth, the other half goes to space. In fact, CO2 cools itself and therefore it cools the atmosphere, too. (compare with Mars. According to the theories of the IPCC, Mars with its Atmosphere of 95% CO2 should be +340°C hot, despite of having 40<% less solar energy and despite the density is just 1% of ours. So, CO2 does cool down, why we only use it in sonic absorbing windows but never in themal insulating windows. Thats where we use Argon, because it reflects 95% of IR rays back into the room) Argon has a good heat capacity. Not only that its not IR active, it takes a lot of kinetic energy to get warm. But like with all matterials with great heat capacity, once its warm, it keeps its energy and provides Energy for a longer time. Therefore Argon would be the real gas to blame for globalwarming, plus its 25 times more abundant that CO2, and its 233 times more abundant than the part of CO2 which is man made. Now, there is this Professor I know, who is an expert in Meteorology and in thermodynamics , who is a passionate propagist of the man made climate change, and he lightmindedly said: "Even if you're slightly right, 1% Argon has no impact, thats just too small in global dimensions." I find that quite interesting, because we all are being told that the 11% of the 0.04% CO2 are responsible for climate change. In other words we are told 0,0044% CO2 cause the big problems and therefore we all need to eat bugs and go electric (which causes 9 times more CO2)

내가 고등학교 때 습득한 과학지식은 우주공간은 원자로 이루어져 있으며 완전 유전체 물질수지 공간이며 질량보존의 질량보존의 기본법칙이다 중력 빅뱅 배경복사 팽창 등 아무것도 일어나지 않으며 원자 자기력으로 움직인다 이것이 암흑 에너지다 자기장이 있는 물질이 회전을 하게 되면 내부의 압력으로 열이 발생하면 지구의 용암 태양의 홍염 코로나 태양풍 흑점과 같은 현상이 생기며 자기장은 자기장의 가두기로 태양은 타고 있으며 타지않으면 블랙홀이다 블랙홀의 중심은 메타물질과 같은 암흑물질이 생기며 폭발은 없으나 폭발하게되면 극지방으로 빠저나간다 그리고 달과 화성에 운석의 충돌 흔적이 많은 것을 보면 자기장의 차이이며 제 역할을 할때는 운석을 밀어내나 역전현상이 생기면 충돌로 이어진다 공룡의 멸종을 부른 운석의 충돌은 자기장이 자전축의 변화로 일어난 것이며 동식물의 진화에서 진화에서 진화는 난활의 시작이 진화를 보여준다 동물극과 식물극의 차이로 동물의 진화는 결정된다 공룡의 알은 노출된 것으로 나와 있으며 그러면 털이 있어야 알을 부화할수 있으나 복원된 공룡이 털이 있는 종류는 하나도 없다 인류의 진화는 유인원에서 시작된 것이 아니라 인 류라는 독자적인 개체에서 진화를 하였으며 유태반류의 높은 지능을 가진것은 유태반류의 특징이며 지구상의 최고의 포식자로 자리매김한 예를 보여준다 인류의 영양상태가 좋아진 것은 녹색 혁명을 맞이 하면서 좋아진 것이다 그리고 식인풍습 근친혼은 근대에도 행해졌으며 이러한 결과는 유전병을 달고 살았으며 유골로만 진화를 판단하는 것은 오류다 흰머리 스트레스 멜라닌 과산화 수소 이것은 흰머리가 나는 주요 원인이다 그러나 이것은 면역과 효소에 의한 것이다 그러나 인간의 의학은 원인만 알지 과정과 결과는 모른다 면역과 효소가 어떻게 일어나는지 서술하지 못한다 스트레스도 쥐를 통해서 가스와 전기자극으로 스트레스를 주면 자손들은 모두 유전된다 식물은 광합성을 하면 영양분이 대부분 토양에 뿌려진다 뿌리의 ARF7 물질을 제거하면 수분을 감지하지 못한다 그러나 인간의 과학지식은 원인이 무엇인지 모른다 화학반응과 물질이다 답은 서술하지 못한다 동식물은 꼬리없는 정자와 꼬리있는 정자로 수정을 하며 어류는 부유성 어류는 성전환을 하며 저서성 어류는 난활때 성이 정해진다 성이 정해질수 빡에 없는 이유가 있다 양자 역학의 스핀은 전자기파에 의해서 영향을 받으며 중첩과 얽힘에서 얽힘은 반물질이며 전하를 계산할수 있다 입자성과 파동성을 동시에 볼수있는 예가 햭 연료 제어봉의 푸른빛이 나는 현상이다 서양의 양자 역학은 불확정성의 원리와 같은 보이지 않는 미적분의 양자 역학이 아니라 동양의 동양 철학의 무극이 태극이요 태극이 무극이요 란 팔괘에서 시작 되면서 보이는 양자역학 미시적인 양자역학 거시적인 원자 자기력을 보여준다 양자 컴퓨터는 원소와 원리를 알아야 할것이다 일반 컴퓨터도 양자 컴퓨터의 효과를 낼수있다 이것뿐만 아니라 인간이 만든 최고의 폭발물은 원폭이다 과거의 원폭은 우랴늄이 주원료로 사용된 것이라면 현대는 기폭제만 우랴늄이고 주원료는 수소다 이것은 우랴늄 기체 폭탄에는 수류탄 급이다 아르곤 가스가 우랴늄 기체다 여기에 두 종류의 기체를 첨가하면 독특한 반응을 보이는데 보이는데 소진할때까지 반응한다 즉 멸종이다 초전도체라는 이론이 나온지 백년이 넘어도 물리적특성도 개념도 모른다 오비탈이 0이고 전기저항이 0이다 이를 수용하는 물질이 우랴늄염이 있다 그리고 직류에만 작용하는 이유와 BTS 이론이 맞지않는 이유가 무엇일까.프라즈마 초전도체 우랴늄염 지구의 내핵 용암 자기장이 같은 현상이다 그러나 설명하지 않는다 답 보다 논리가 문제다 한 나라의 국방은 항공모함에 달려있다 이 항공모함의 제일 큰 비중은 캐타펄트이며 수증기식이나 전자식이나 문제가 많다 제일 적은 비용으로 할수있는 방법이 폭약식과 유압식이다 유압식이다 추진기의 기술은 보여주지도 않는다 그 이유는 추진기만 보면 음파를 알수있기 때문이다 그러나 이 음파도 조와저항을 줄이면 음파도 줄일수 있다 인간의 인간의 다스리는 봉독이 중합 효소인 까닭과 결합과 성분이 병에 작용하는 원리는 무엇일까 그리고 독버섯의 독과의 같은 점은 점은 그리고 이 같은 자료가 5년 동안 몰래카메라 한국 방송공사 인간극장 촬영으로 얼마나 아래와 같은 자료가 남의 손에 들어 갔는지 모른다 이것은 처음에는 상사병 이라고 주민들에게 알려져 있었으나 본질은 논문 대필용이었다 실제로 그 다음해 2월에 2월에 인터넷에 나왔으며 그 후에도 몇편더 확인할수 있었다 그리고 안기부 맨하탄 솔루션 문 제인 대통령도 자주 왔었던 걸로 주민들은 알고 있으며 나는 그기에 대해서는 잘 모른다 그리고 다른 사람이 이 자료를 활용하면 논문 대필이다

So, it is subjective and objective at the same time?😅

Impossible d’aborder ce domaine sans passer par la relativite restreinte montrant un espace à 4 dimensions dont le temps L’esprit humain est incapable d’imaginer cet espace à 4 dimension, il est obligatoire de passer par le calcul du paradoxe des jumeaux D’où l’inutilité de ces milliers de vidéo sur you tube

This is science.. things are contoĺed for either outcome

In a controlled environment only

if we compare matter and antimatter to 0=-1+1 and if the void was infinite, could most matter and antimatter go in opposite directions? just like how waves go in different directions... :)

quantum bullshht. No quantum computer on Earth can add 2+2. So what are we even talking about?

You cannot model the universe without a computer larger than the universe. this means the right thing to do is never ask the question about determinism in the first place.

Totally. It is infact its the first time I have ever understood what the term quantum mechanics means in general. Classical Mechanics = planets. (Sort of...) Quantum Mechanics = atoms. (Sort of....) Brilliant.

I am not quite understanding. If one particle is up and the other is down like one is heads and one is Tails then obviously the other one is going to be different than the other regardless of the space or distance between the two that was established when the particles were made and then separated so what's the big deal ?

very elucidating! Thank you for doing it! So when the electrons become "particles", does that neccesarily mean they enter Space-Time? I know they are peaks in the fields, but do the fields remain separate for our space time until they become so called particles?

free and will are paradoxical no matter how much mental gymnastics we can try if anyone or anything were to insert any will in randomness, it's no longer random. which means it's determined and if it's determined, you're not free. If it's random, it's not a will

Nice presentation, with useful knowledge delivered in a short and very interesting video. Thank you. One question / objection: the equation presented at min 5:50 looks awkward. The two elements on the right side of the equality sign have different units of measure. The very last term (pe-po)*Ae is indeed a force, but (m*Ve) looks like momentum. Unless there is a division by time in the first term, they cannot be added together.

1. The speed of light is not a law of physics. It is merely a phenomenon. So Einstein was wrong in thinking that the laws of physics would be violated (as per your statement at 7:33). What he was in fact doing was framing his premise as argument, which is a logical fallacy. He was using SR as a premise in order to derive SR, which is circular. 2. Time Dilation is based on a geometric error and thus so is SR. They are therefore false. In the famous train light-clock thought experiment, there would be in fact no angular light beam (no hypotenuse) and thus no need to introduce a different time scale. 3. E=mc^2 has nothing to do with SR. Further, Einstein plagiarised the equation from Olinto De Pretto, who published it a year before. So all you are doing is repeating dogma and logical errors. As for the idea that light always travels at the same speed ... well yes it does, but only on an absolute basis. If a light beam is heading toward me from a star at 186,000 miles/sec, and I am in a rocket ship heading toward the beam at 100,000 miles/sec, the gap between my ship and the beam from the star is closing at 286,000 miles per second. So light does travel faster than 186,000 miles/sec RELATIVELY. And so it is ironic that you relativists don't understand the meaning of relative. Light only travels at 186,000 miles/sec on an absolute basis, not a relative basis. If I fire a light beam out in front of me and then run after it at 100,000 miles/sec, it will only be heading away from me as 86,000 miles/sec. In a nutshell, SR is mysticism dressed up as science. And no wonder, for Einstein was a pantheist and ardent disciple of Spinoza.

Man will go to absurd lengths to avoid accountability to their Creator. "A fool says there is no God."

What if gravity is the sum of all the weak forces at a distance? You have almost an infinite amount of quarks inside a planet. If you add up all these individual weak forces and there is almost an infinite amount of them, you may get gravity at distance. The weak force acts at a small distance when you are talking about a small number of particles, but if you add up all of them inside a planet? They might become significant at distance.

We need to observe the behavior of fields around photons as they move and possibly go light instead of heavy by manipulating higgs

After the fact, we can prove that everything was predetermined. Before the fact, we can't have a clue since the act of measuring and calculating affects the environment itself according to quantum physics. Therefore, it doesn't matter if you believe in free will or not; in any action, there is an element of the unknown future. We make choices because the outcome is never 100% certain, regardless of a predetermined present. In other words, everything is known and predetermined, but we don't know it yet. Call it free will, and you can't be wrong.

C: time; past-present-future "reality"

Quantum mechanics is useful. It's statistical. It's fuzzy. Some claim it's reality. But not I. Reality is precise. But complete knowledge and measurement is not possible. So we calculate probabilities. And yes there are some spooky things that SEEM to deny this. Perhaps it's just a matter of perspective. I maintain particles are exact but space itself is fuzzy.

To be, in fact, a real person or something fake as AI in the state of any resolution, at least we are all good examples of elements and efficiency in variables, especially like bonding or reactions. A beautiful example of the similar factors in a person versus the pretend.

So tired of people trying to grab headlines by saying something breaks the laws of physics. Just stop dude

Just another materialist claiming with precisely no proof that consciousness is unimportant to our reality. Someday in the not too distant future we will finally accept that consciousness is the fundamental non-reducible center of our reality. But these children here still have a lot of growing up to do.

Absolutely!

Who told you to say that

Photons, electrons, and the like should be thought of as discrete objects, which have the form of one or more localized waves. I say "or more" because a wave packet can be broken up into more wave packets, as in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. But an electron that is absorbed by a material like a metal or a single atom, happens so in its entirety. It is an indivisible object.

Yucca Mountain in Amargosa Valley NV is a perfect location. We have an adequate educated labor supply, Interstate Highway, a customer base nearby, and long-term waste storage already built. Look into it!

this is concisely explained and I appreciate your effort in doing it! Are there any theories as to why photos do not interact with the Higgs field?

Animals that are complex in their formation, that is, not primitive, are very numerous. If their number is not in the millions, then their number will be in the hundreds of thousands or tens of thousands at least. According to what I talked about in the video, the ancestor of man was forced to leave the trees mainly due to circumstances and was forced to come down to the ground and use his hands. This developed his brain very greatly and we became intelligent in the basic image because of this. These circumstances are not rare. They are normal circumstances. It is possible that the environment forces other species to adopt certain strategies. As a result of these strategies, in order to survive, their brains develop, as happened with us. Why are there no intelligent creatures like us? We are the only species. Isn’t it logical, according to the large numbers, that there are some few species that have intelligence similar to us if the reason is like what I talked about?

Quantum tunneling from where???????????????? This is ridiculous. Physicists keep trying to obfuscate and confuse people into believing that something came from nothing but not really! BS.

Now how do we predict what color would be emitted or absorbed? That's something about chemistry I really lack knowledge about

probably

What about a 5th dimension, where you have uncountable blocks, which are unfolding in every point of time. so if you have uncountable points on at the first dimension, and uncountable lines in second dimension, you have uncountable areas in the 3d- room and you have uncountable rooms in the time or you have uncountable time-rooms in the 4th dimension and if every second a new time-direction arises (because of multiple decisions or causes), it is unlikely necessary to think about a 6th Dimension. .I think to ride throug this dimensions we have to bring our conciousness on another level and we have to leave our three dimensional body , just one time. People who had near-death experiences speak about these experiences of traveling through time and space. Thanks for this video # every time

Is it possible that the current understanding of q m would work fine, even the weird stuff. The spooky action at a distance could work fine if time is in fact running backwards. So we stand still in time, and time goes past us ?

That's facinating, now solve tinnitus please.

I find the casual description of this extremely confronting. And frighteningly sobering. We have become the destroyer of worlds.

I’m glad I found your channel, good job on all the great content!

Question: would you still have the same mass in space as on Earth? Seems like atmospheric pressure would reduce our mass on Earth…

When humans traveled to unknown places on our own planet did we hide? did we hide from possible strange creatures because they might attack us? No. If aliens exist they are probably so far away that it is simply not worth the effort to try to reach out to us. The probability of receiving some type of ancient message is higher though, there would be no point in trying to reply as their species would probably have ceased existing after 100,000's or millions of years the message took traveling to us.

There is also a 5th force. This force is pushing galaxies away from each other. If presence of Mass produces attractive force lack of Mass should produce repulsive force. Free space has no mass but has energy which produces repulsive force.

All forces arise from interaction b/w fields. To keep an atom stable certain critical flux density is required inside the atom. Higher density tends to collapse while lower density splits the atom. To maintain critical density atoms keep changing number of protons through beta decay. To reduce density proton changes to neutron & to increase density neutron changes to proton.weak nuclear force could be repulsive at lower density & attractive in higher density.

Iodine gas is looking real familiar to elixir from clash of clans 🤨

all b.s.

So fission creates strong and weak nuclear force to produce atomic nucleus. The leftover electrons prbiting it are stabilised by chemical (electromagnetic) reaction

Where’s the KABOOM? There’s supposed to be n Earth-shattering KABOOM? 🤓

𝐼 𝑛𝑒𝑒𝑑 𝑢𝑟 ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑝 𝑖𝑛 𝑝ℎ𝑦𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑠